From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byler v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 30, 1911
119 P. 1022 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)

Opinion

No. A-906.

Opinion Filed December 30, 1911.

Appeal from Kay County Court; Claude Duval, Judge.

Herman S. Gurley, for plaintiff in error.

Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error was convicted upon an indictment returned in the district court and duly transferred to the county court of Kay county, which charged that he did have in his possession intoxicating liquor with the intent to violate provisions of the prohibition law. May 28, 1910, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, the defendant was sentenced to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of fifty dollars. To reverse this judgment an appeal was taken. The state introduced but one witness, the agent of the Wells, Fargo Express Company, at Blackwell, who produced a copy of the waybill, and stated that the original waybill had been sent to the head office of the Wells, Fargo Express Company, in New York. Over the defendant's objection, the copy was introduced as evidence, and the witness was permitted to testify to an explanation of the breviations thereon. The facts and issues in this case and the assignments of error are the same as in the case of W.H. Adams v. State, infra, and present the same questions. For the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed.


Summaries of

Byler v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Dec 30, 1911
119 P. 1022 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)
Case details for

Byler v. State

Case Details

Full title:J. BYLER v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Dec 30, 1911

Citations

119 P. 1022 (Okla. Crim. App. 1911)
119 P. 1022