Opinion
October, 1920.
Present — Jenks, P.J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ.
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The effect of continuing to care for and handle defendant's horse was a question of fact, as the matter of assumption of risk has not been abrogated in the Labor Law, section 202. (See Wiley v. Solvay Process Co., 215 N.Y. 584.)