From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byerly v. Haviland

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 13, 2005
Case No. 1:05 CV 1095 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 13, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05 CV 1095.

October 13, 2005.


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon Magistrate Judge David S. Perelman's Report and Recommendation, filed on September 21, 2005. (Dkt. #14). In his report, Magistrate Judge Perelman recommended that this action be DISMISSED.

FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within ten (10) days after service, but Petitioner has failed to timely file any such objections. Therefore, the Court must assume that Petitioner is satisfied with the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and an inefficient use of the Court's limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Perelman (Dkt. #14) is hereby ADOPTED, and this case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Byerly v. Haviland

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 13, 2005
Case No. 1:05 CV 1095 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 13, 2005)
Case details for

Byerly v. Haviland

Case Details

Full title:STEPHEN W. BYERLY, SR., Petitioner, v. JAMES HAVILAND, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 13, 2005

Citations

Case No. 1:05 CV 1095 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 13, 2005)