From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Byer v. Byer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1993
199 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 13, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Goodman, J.).


Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, by increasing the pendente lite maintenance from $250 to $400 per week; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the defendant.

As we have repeatedly noted, pendente lite awards should be an accommodation between the reasonable needs of the moving spouse and the financial ability of the other spouse (see, Polito v Polito, 168 A.D.2d 440), and are to be determined with due regard for the preseparation standard of living (see, Salerno v Salerno, 142 A.D.2d 670, 672). Moreover, although generally the best remedy for any claimed inequity in a temporary award is a speedy trial (see, Cohen v Cohen, 129 A.D.2d 550), "the rule is not ironclad when the award is deficient" (Bernstein v Bernstein, 143 A.D.2d 168, 169).

Based on an assessment of the foregoing considerations, we conclude that the amount awarded by the Supreme Court was deficient to the extent indicated. Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Eiber, O'Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Byer v. Byer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1993
199 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Byer v. Byer

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN BYER, Respondent, v. KATHLEEN BYER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 298 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
604 N.Y.S.2d 254

Citing Cases

Wald v. Wald

The wife is entitled to a pendente lite award of $1,750 per month in combined maintenance and child support,…

Silver v. Silver

The husband appeals and we modify. Pendente lite awards "should be an accommodation between the reasonable…