From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BVM Incorporated v. Kenosha Steel Castings, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 21, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-cv-01435-MSK-KMT (D. Colo. Jul. 21, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-01435-MSK-KMT.

July 21, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the court on plaintiff's "Motion to Issue Order to Show Cause" [Doc. No. 6, filed July 11, 2008].

The plaintiff has alleged federal jurisdiction and venue for the four causes of action contained in its Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 and 1391, diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff also invokes the provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 64 with respect to his "Fourth Claim for Relief (Replevin)."

Replevin is often referred to as a mixed action, being partly in rem and partly in personam. The United States District Court's jurisdiction of an action to replevin property which lies both outside the district and outside the state whose statutory provisions are being applied, is subject to debate. Compare, e.g., Steel Motor Service v. Zalke, 212 F.2d 856 (6th Cir. 1954) and Central Transport, Inc. v. Theurer, Inc. 430 F. Supp. 1076 (E.D. Mich. 1977). See also General Electric Capital Corp. v. East Coast Yacht Sales, Inc., 757 F. Supp. 19 (E.D. Pa. 1991).

Therefore, the plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to submit briefing on or before July 30, 2008, addressing the threshold issues of proper venue and jurisdiction for this court's issuance of a show cause order pursuant to Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 104 on Plaintiff's replevin claim.


Summaries of

BVM Incorporated v. Kenosha Steel Castings, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 21, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-cv-01435-MSK-KMT (D. Colo. Jul. 21, 2008)
Case details for

BVM Incorporated v. Kenosha Steel Castings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BVM INCORPORATED, a Colorado Corporation, Plaintiff, v. KENOSHA STEEL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 21, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-01435-MSK-KMT (D. Colo. Jul. 21, 2008)