From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buzzard v. Swenson

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Nov 16, 2007
CASE NO. C06-1653-JLR-MAT (W.D. Wash. Nov. 16, 2007)

Summary

explaining that "under the 'prison mailbox rule,' pleadings filed by prisoners are considered filed the day that the pleading in question is deposited in the prison mail system"

Summary of this case from McNack v. Fairbank

Opinion

CASE NO. C06-1653-JLR-MAT.

November 16, 2007


ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKING PETITIONER'S PENDING MOTIONS AS MOOT


The Court, having reviewed respondent's motion to dismiss (Dkt. 41), petitioner's pending motions (Dkts. 38, 39, 46 48), the Report and Recommendation of Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;
(2) Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice;
(3) Petitioner's pending motions are STRICKEN AS MOOT; and,
(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent, and to Judge Theiler.


Summaries of

Buzzard v. Swenson

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle
Nov 16, 2007
CASE NO. C06-1653-JLR-MAT (W.D. Wash. Nov. 16, 2007)

explaining that "under the 'prison mailbox rule,' pleadings filed by prisoners are considered filed the day that the pleading in question is deposited in the prison mail system"

Summary of this case from McNack v. Fairbank
Case details for

Buzzard v. Swenson

Case Details

Full title:RONALD BUZZARD, JR., Petitioner, v. DARREN SWENSON, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle

Date published: Nov 16, 2007

Citations

CASE NO. C06-1653-JLR-MAT (W.D. Wash. Nov. 16, 2007)

Citing Cases

McNack v. Fairbank

Defendants subsequently answered plaintiff's complaint on December 30, 2013. On January 14, 2014, plaintiff…