From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butterfield v. Roger

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 5, 2012
381 P.3d 598 (Nev. 2012)

Opinion

No. 58953.

09-05-2012

Robert L. BUTTERFIELD, Appellant, v. David ROGER, District Attorney; and the State of Nevada, Respondents.

Robert L. Butterfield Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division


Robert L. Butterfield

Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a proper person appeal from a district court order dismissing appellant's civil rights complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kenneth C. Cory, Judge.

In the district court, appellant filed a timely motion to reconsider the district court's decision dismissing the complaint. This motion tolled the time to appeal. NRAP 4(a)(4) ; AA Primo Builders v. Washington. 126 Nev. ––––, ––––, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (holding that a motion for reconsideration will be given NRCP 59(e) status, with tolling effect, if it “is in writing, timely filed, states its grounds with particularity, and request[s] a substantive alteration of the judgment, not merely the correction of a clerical error, or relief of a type wholly collateral to the judgment”) (internal quotations omitted). Because the motion has not been resolved by the district court, we conclude that appellant's notice of appeal is premature and we therefore lack jurisdiction. NRAP 4(a)(6). Any aggrieved party may file a notice of appeal after the motion for reconsideration is resolved. NRAP 4(a)(4). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Butterfield v. Roger

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 5, 2012
381 P.3d 598 (Nev. 2012)
Case details for

Butterfield v. Roger

Case Details

Full title:Robert L. BUTTERFIELD, Appellant, v. David ROGER, District Attorney; and…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Sep 5, 2012

Citations

381 P.3d 598 (Nev. 2012)