From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. Third Avenue Railroad Co.

Supreme Court — Appellate Term
Mar 1, 1896
16 Misc. 679 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)

Opinion

March, 1896.

Hoadly, Lauterbach Johnson, for appellant.

John H. Rogan, for respondent.


The return shows the usual conflict of evidence found in negligence cases.

The evidence was sufficient to warrant the justice in finding that the injuries complained of were the result of the defendant's negligence, and that the plaintiff was free from fault. The damages allowed were fully substantiated.

We find no error.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Present: McADAM and BISCHOFF, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Butler v. Third Avenue Railroad Co.

Supreme Court — Appellate Term
Mar 1, 1896
16 Misc. 679 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)
Case details for

Butler v. Third Avenue Railroad Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BUTLER, Respondent, v . THE THIRD AVENUE RAILROAD CO., Appellant

Court:Supreme Court — Appellate Term

Date published: Mar 1, 1896

Citations

16 Misc. 679 (N.Y. App. Term 1896)