From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. Matteson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:21-cv-0032-KJM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0032-KJM-EFB P

09-27-2021

JEROME BUTLER, Petitioner, v. GISELLE MATTESON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 5, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file and carefully considered the objections, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. Petitioner’s January 6, 2021 motion to stay (ECF No. 2) is denied;

3. The petition is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust state remedies;

4. The Clerk is directed to close the case; and

5. The court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Butler v. Matteson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 27, 2021
2:21-cv-0032-KJM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)
Case details for

Butler v. Matteson

Case Details

Full title:JEROME BUTLER, Petitioner, v. GISELLE MATTESON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0032-KJM-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 27, 2021)