From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. Kidston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Dec 11, 2014
Case No. 2:14-CV-237 JD (N.D. Ind. Dec. 11, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 2:14-CV-237 JD

12-11-2014

RONALD H. BUTLER Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL A. KIDSTON, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

Now before the Court is Plaintiff Ronald H. Butler's second amended motion for entry of default against the Defendants. [DE 18]. The motion and attachments show that the Plaintiff properly served the amended complaint on both Defendants by certified mail sent on November 6, 2014 and received on November 10, 2014. The Defendants' time to answer or respond to the amended complaint has now passed, but neither Defendant has appeared in this action. Under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, "When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." Therefore, Plaintiff's motion [DE 18] is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter default as to both Defendants.

SO ORDERED.

ENTERED: December 11, 2014

/s/ JON E. DEGUILIO

Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Butler v. Kidston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
Dec 11, 2014
Case No. 2:14-CV-237 JD (N.D. Ind. Dec. 11, 2014)
Case details for

Butler v. Kidston

Case Details

Full title:RONALD H. BUTLER Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL A. KIDSTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

Date published: Dec 11, 2014

Citations

Case No. 2:14-CV-237 JD (N.D. Ind. Dec. 11, 2014)