From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. Delta Airlines

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Orangeburg Division
Oct 23, 2024
Civil Action 5:24-4232-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 5:24-4232-MGL

10-23-2024

PHILLIP MITCHELL BUTLER, Plaintiff, v. DELTA AIRLINES; ED BASTIAN, CEO; EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT DAN JANKI; and CHIEF MARKETING OFFICER ALICIA TILLMAN, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

MARY GEIGER LEWIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff Phillip Mitchell Butler (Butler) filed this lawsuit against the above-listed defendants. He is representing himself.

The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge recommending to the Court this action be dismissed. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on September 30, 2024, but Butler failed to file any objections to the Report. “[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.'” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 72 advisory committee's note). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review. Rodgers v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report, and incorporates it herein. It is therefore the judgment of the Court this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within thirty days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Butler v. Delta Airlines

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Orangeburg Division
Oct 23, 2024
Civil Action 5:24-4232-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Butler v. Delta Airlines

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP MITCHELL BUTLER, Plaintiff, v. DELTA AIRLINES; ED BASTIAN, CEO…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Orangeburg Division

Date published: Oct 23, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 5:24-4232-MGL (D.S.C. Oct. 23, 2024)