From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Butler v. Commonwealth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 20, 2013
Civil Action No. 11 - 826 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11 - 826

08-20-2013

CLARENCE LAMONT BUTLER, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondents.


District Judge Terrence F. McVerry

Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation issued by Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on July 23, 2013, recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. The parties were served with the Report and Recommendation and informed that they had until August 9, 2013, to file written objections. Petitioner filed untimely objections to the Report and Recommendation on August 12, 2013. Notwithstanding the untimeliness, Petitioner's objections do not undermine the recommendation of the magistrate judge. As such, after de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the following order is entered.

This is the filing date under the "mailbox rule." Pennsylvania and federal courts employ the prisoner mailbox rule. See Perry v. Diguglielmo, 169 Fed. Appx. 134, 136 n.3 (3d Cir. 2006) (citing Commonwealth v. Little, 716 A.2d 1287 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1998)); Burns v. Morton, 134 F.3d 109, 113 (3d Cir. 1998). Under this doctrine, a prisoner's pro se pleading is deemed filed when delivered to prison officials for mailing. See Burns, 134 F.3d at 113; Commonwealth v. Castro, 766 A.2d 1283, 1287 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2001) (deemed filed when given to proper prison authority or placed in a prison mailbox). Petitioner's objections are postmarked August 12, 2013.

AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 2013,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 3) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation dated July 23, 2013, (ECF No. 11), is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

Terrence F. McVerry

United States District Judge
cc: Clarence Lamont Butler

GN 6823

S.C.I. Greene

175 Progress Drive

Waynesburg, PA 15370

(Via First Class U.S. Postal Mail)

Counsel of Record

(Via ECF Electronic Mail)


Summaries of

Butler v. Commonwealth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 20, 2013
Civil Action No. 11 - 826 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Butler v. Commonwealth

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE LAMONT BUTLER, Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 20, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11 - 826 (W.D. Pa. Aug. 20, 2013)