From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bustani v. Wells

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 9, 1974
291 So. 2d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 73-266.

March 8, 1974. Rehearing Denied April 9, 1974.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County, Culver Smith, J.

Ronald Sales and Joseph P. Metzger, Sales Metzger Christiansen, Palm Beach, for appellant.

Daniel H. Jones, Moyle Gentry Jones Flanigan, West Palm Beach, for appellees.


Appellant, a real estate salesman, sued his former broker for a share of a real estate commission. The trial Court, after a nonjury trial, found for the broker (appellee).

Appellant left appellee's employment in January 1970. The contract for sale was executed in January 1971, and the transaction was closed in February 1971 — both occurring while appellant was registered as a salesman with another broker. Therefore, the requirement of Sec. 475.42(1)(d), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., that appellee be registered as appellant's employer "at the time the cause of action is alleged to have arisen", was not met. Whether the conflicting evidence was sufficient to render the statute inapplicable was properly a question for the trial court.

Affirmed.

OWEN, C.J., DOWNEY, J., and JOHNSON, CLARENCE T., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Bustani v. Wells

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 9, 1974
291 So. 2d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Bustani v. Wells

Case Details

Full title:G. ROBERT BUSTANI, APPELLANT, v. MARSHALL WELLS, AND MARSHALL WELLS REAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 9, 1974

Citations

291 So. 2d 660 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Citing Cases

Hughes Assoc. v. Mottice Assoc

Consequently, summary judgment was proper. This case is not like Bustani v. Wells, 291 So.2d 660 (Fla. 4th…