Summary
affirming the revocation of the appellant's probation and the resulting sentence in the Anders appeal but remanding for the trial court to enter a corrected written order specifying that the appellant only admitted to violating the conditions of probation as alleged in the affidavit of violation of probation
Summary of this case from Ephron v. StateOpinion
No. 1D17-1803
01-22-2019
Quinnteris D. BUSSIE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Per Curiam.
In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting sentence, but remand for the trial court to enter a corrected written order specifying that the Appellant only admitted violating the conditions of probation as alleged in the affidavit of violation of probation. See Altman v. State , 252 So.3d 426, 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (citing to Margolis v. State , 148 So.3d 532, 532 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (affirming revocation of probation and resulting sentence, but remanding for entry of corrected revocation order of listing only the conditions of probation to which the defendant admitted); Narvaez v. State , 674 So.2d 868, 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (noting that written order of revocation must comport with oral pronouncement, and remanding with instructions to strike from the order violations neither admitted to nor found by the court). Appellant need not be present for this correction.
AFFIRMED , but REMANDED for correction.
Wolf, Lewis, and Wetherell, JJ., concur.