From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bussie v. House Oversight Comm.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 24, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cv-32 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-32

02-24-2014

ANTHONY BUSSIE, Plaintiff, v. HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE, et al., Defendants.


Dlott, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.


REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Federal Detention Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, initiated this action by filing a pro se civil complaint without paying the requisite filing fee or submitting an in forma pauperis application in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)-(h). (Doc. 1). On January 14, 2014, the undersigned issued a Deficiency Order requiring plaintiff to either pay $400 ($350 filing fee plus $50 administrative fee) or submit a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in compliance with the PLRA within thirty (30) days. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Deficiency Order. (Doc. 4).

It has recently come to the undersigned's attention that plaintiff "has accumulated at least three 'strikes'" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and, therefore, is barred by that provision from proceeding in forma pauperis unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See Bussie v. Boehner, No. 14-cv-00077-MJR, 2014 WL 585377 (S.D. Ill. Feb. 14, 2014). Therefore, it is RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's objection to the January 14, 2014 Deficiency Order (Doc. 4) be DENIED and that the case be DISMISSED unless plaintiff pays within thirty (30) days of the date of filing of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation the $400 fee ($350 filing fee plus $50 administrative fee) required to initiate this action.

IT IS SO RECOMMENDED.

__________

Karen L. Litkovitz

United States Magistrate Judge
ANTHONY BUSSIE, Plaintiff,

vs HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE, et al., Defendants.

Case No. 1:14-cv-32


Dlott, J.

Litkovitz, M.J.


NOTICE

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. This period may be extended further by the Court on timely motion for an extension. Such objections shall specify the portions of the Report objected to and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law in support of the objections. If the Report and Recommendation is based in whole or in part upon matters occurring on the record at an oral hearing, the objecting party shall promptly arrange for the transcription of the record, or such portions of it as all parties may agree upon, or the Magistrate Judge deems sufficient, unless the assigned District Judge otherwise directs. A party may respond to another party's objections WITHIN 14 DAYS after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to make objections in accordance with this procedure may forfeit rights on appeal. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).

SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION

COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY

[ ×] Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.

[ ×] Print your name and address on the reverse so that we can return the card to you.

[ ×] Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits.

A. Signature

×

[×] Agent

[ ] Addressee

B. Received by (Printed Name)

C. Date of Delivery

1. Article Addressed to:

D. Is deliver address different from item 1? [ ] Yes

If YES, enter delivery address below: [ ] No

3. Sendee Type

[×] Certifiled Mail [ ] Express Mail

[ ] Registered [ ] Return Receipt for Merchandise

[ ] Insured Mail [ ] C.O.D.

4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee)

[ ] Yes

2. Article Number 7002 3150 0000 8389 9838

(Transfer from service label)

[ ×] PS Form 3811, February 2004

Domestic Return Receipt

102595-02-M-1540




Summaries of

Bussie v. House Oversight Comm.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Feb 24, 2014
Case No. 1:14-cv-32 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Bussie v. House Oversight Comm.

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY BUSSIE, Plaintiff, v. HOUSE OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 24, 2014

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-32 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2014)

Citing Cases

Bussie v. Boehner

See id. at *2. See also Bussie v. House Oversight Committee, Case No. 1:14-cv-32 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 24, 2014)…