From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buskirk v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 28, 2022
Civil Action 22-1826 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-1826

09-28-2022

GARY L. BUSKIRK, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

EDWARD G. SMITH, J.

AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2022, upon consideration of Plaintiff Gary L. Buskirk's Motions to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. Nos. 6 & 7), his Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Doc. No. 5), and his pro se Complaint (Doc. No. 2), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

2. Gary L. Buskirk, # 0027398, shall pay the full filing fee of $350 in installments, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), regardless of the outcome of this case. The Court directs the Warden of Northampton County Prison or other appropriate official to assess an initial filing fee of 20% of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to Buskirk's inmate account; or (b) the average monthly balance in Buskirk's inmate account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this case. The Warden of Northampton County Prison or other appropriate official shall calculate, collect, and forward the initial payment assessed pursuant to this Order to the Court with a reference to the docket number for this case. In each succeeding month when the amount in Buskirk's inmate trust fund account exceeds $10.00, the Warden of Northampton County Prison or other appropriate official shall forward payments to the Clerk of Court equaling 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Buskirk's inmate account until the fees are paid. Each payment shall refer to the docket number for this case.

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to SEND a copy of this Order to the Warden of Northampton County Prison.

4. The Complaint is DEEMED filed.

5. Buskirk's Complaint is DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE AND STAYED IN PART as follows:

a. All claims against Defendant Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, as well as the official capacity claims against Defendants Agent Mitzak, Agent Mugavero, and Agent Ms. Robinson are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum.
b. The individual capacity claims against Defendants Agent Mitzak, Agent Mugavero, and Agent Ms. Robinson subject to Younger abstention are STAYED until such time as all related proceeding in state court have been resolved.

6. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to terminate the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole as a Defendant.

7. Buskirk is DIRECTED to notify the Court when his parole revocation proceedings have terminated.

BY THE COURT:


Summaries of

Buskirk v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 28, 2022
Civil Action 22-1826 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Buskirk v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Case Details

Full title:GARY L. BUSKIRK, Plaintiff, v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 28, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22-1826 (E.D. Pa. Sep. 28, 2022)