From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Busken v. Pulitzer

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 16, 2009
296 S.W.3d 487 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. ED92655.

September 22, 2009. Rehearing Denied November 16, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Steven R. Ohmer, Judge.

Paul C. Hetterman, Bartley Goffstein, L.L.C., St. Louis, MO, for plaintiffs/appellant.

Marvin L. Lindmark, Bobroff, Hesse, Lindmark Martone, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for respondents.

Before KATHIANNE KNAUP CRANE, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J., and NANNETTE A. BAKER, J.



ORDER


Plaintiff appeals from the judgment in defendants' favor in his action for damages for breach of his St. Louis Post-Dispatch Suburban Distributor Service Agreement. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, settling forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Busken v. Pulitzer

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Nov 16, 2009
296 S.W.3d 487 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Busken v. Pulitzer

Case Details

Full title:Steve BUSKEN, Pedros Chekoudjian, Steve Davis, James Hussey, Gary…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Nov 16, 2009

Citations

296 S.W.3d 487 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009)