From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Busick v. Collins

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1930
151 S.E. 191 (N.C. 1930)

Opinion

(Filed 22 January, 1930.)

CIVIL ACTION, before MacRae, Special Judge, at February Term, 1929, of ROCKINGHAM.

Brown Trotter for plaintiff.

No counsel for defendant.


The plaintiff instituted an action against the defendant to recover the sum of $279.20 for goods sold and delivered to members of the family of defendant. The defendant denied liability upon the account, and the cause was heard before the recorder, who rendered judgment for the plaintiff. Thereupon the defendant appealed to the Superior Court.

At the conclusion of the evidence the trial judge dismissed the action, and the plaintiff appealed.


The verified itemized statement offered in evidence was competent. Wright Co., v. Green, 196 N.C. 197, 145 S.E. 16.

Furthermore, the itemized statement was not objected to at the time it was offered and admitted.

Irrespective of the itemized statement, there was testimony, which, if true, tended to establish the liability of defendant.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Busick v. Collins

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1930
151 S.E. 191 (N.C. 1930)
Case details for

Busick v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:J. O. BUSICK AND W. H. GENTRY, TRADING AS D. W. BUSICK'S SON, v. W. M…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1930

Citations

151 S.E. 191 (N.C. 1930)
198 N.C. 817