Our law gives the circuit court leeway to modify a sentence between pronouncement and judgment. Bush v. State, 90 Ark. App. 373, 377-78, 206 S.W.3d 268, 271 (2005). Furlow incorrectly relies on Turner v. State, 88 Ark. App. 40, 194 S.W.3d 225 (2004), for the contrary proposition.
Id. Weighing the evidence, reconciling conflicts in the testimony, and assessing credibility are all matters exclusively for the trier of fact, in this case the jury. Gikonyo v. State, 102 Ark. App. 223, 283 S.W.3d 631 (2008) ; Bush v. State, 90 Ark. App. 373, 206 S.W.3d 268 (2005). The jury may accept or reject any part of a witness's testimony, and its conclusion on credibility is binding on the appellate court. Brown v. State, 2009 Ark. App. 873, 2009 WL 4844677.
We do not, however, weigh the evidence presented at trial, as that is a matter for the fact-finder; nor will we weigh the credibility of the witnesses. Bush v. State, 90 Ark. App. 373, 206 S.W.3d 268 (2005). Appellant was charged pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-13-201(a)(1) (Repl.
Weighing the evidence and assessing the credibility of the witnesses are matters for the fact-finder. Bush v. State, 90 Ark. App. 373, 206 S.W.3d 268 (2005). Moreover, the fact-finder is entitled to draw upon common sense and experience in reaching its verdict.
In short, we affirm Morris's theft-of-property conviction regarding Crenshaw's cell phone. Bush v. State, 90 Ark. App. 373, 377, 206 S.W.3d 268, 270-71 (2005). Last, Morris argues that the weapons were only directed at Crenshaw and Anderson and, therefore, his aggravated robbery convictions relating to Stephanie, Kiara, and Brown are not supported by substantial evidence.
While we acknowledge that the evidence before us regarding the consent to search is in direct conflict, weighing the evidence and assessing the credibility of the witnesses are matters for the fact-finder. Bush v. State, 90 Ark.App. 373, 206 S.W.3d 268 (2005). The jury is free to believe all or part of any witness's testimony and resolves questions of conflicting testimony and inconsistent evidence.
Weighing the evidence and assessing the credibility of the witnesses are matters for the fact-finder. Bush v. State, 90 Ark.App. 373, 206 S.W.3d 268 (2005). The jury is free to believe all or part of any witness's testimony and resolves questions of conflicting testimony and inconsistent evidence.
Weighing the evidence and assessing the credibility of the witnesses are matters for the fact-finder. Bush v. State, 90 Ark.App. 373, 206 S.W.3d 268 (2005). The jury is free to believe all or part of any witness's testimony and resolves questions of conflicting testimony and inconsistent evidence.
Weighing the evidence and assessing the credibility of the witnesses are matters for the fact-finder. Bush v. State, 90 Ark.App. 373, 206 S.W.3d 268 (2005). The jury is free to believe all or part of any witness's testimony and resolves questions of conflicting testimony and inconsistent evidence.
Although the trial judge's verbal indication of guilt found that appellant committed a Class C felony, the judgment and commitment order denotes a Class B felony, and it controls. Bush v. State, 90 Ark. App. 373, 206 S.W.3d 268 (2005). However, the car had been stolen from the home of Susan Thomas in early December 2007. Thomas testified that she bought the 1994 Honda in June 1997 for a price of $9,800.