From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bush v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 17, 1925
103 So. 91 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

7 Div. 72.

February 17, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Calhoun County; S.W. Tate, Judge.

Grute Bush was convicted of having in his possession prohibited liquors, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Chas. D. Kline, of Anniston, for appellant.

The burden of proof was not discharged by the state, and defendant was due the affirmative charge. Windham v. State, ante p. 16, 100 So. 457.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

There was ample testimony to sustain a conviction.


The officers found a jug containing about one and one-half gallons of corn whisky on the side of a hill 200 or 300 yards from defendant's house and not shown to be on defendant's premises. There was some testimony tending to show that there were some empty jugs and funnels that had had whisky in them found in defendant's house. The prosecution was for the possession of the one and one-half gallons of whisky in the jug. There is no sufficient evidence connecting defendant with the possession of this whisky. The affirmative charge should have been given for defendant.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Bush v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Feb 17, 1925
103 So. 91 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Bush v. State

Case Details

Full title:BUSH v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Feb 17, 1925

Citations

103 So. 91 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
20 Ala. App. 486

Citing Cases

Perkins v. State

Bradshaw Barnett, of Florence, for appellant. If whisky is found on the premises of one whom the evidence…

Holland v. State

Dennison v. State, 17 Ala. App. 674, 88 So. 211; Powell v. State, 20 Ala. App. 606, 104 So. 551. Defendant…