From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bush v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2014
120 A.D.3d 1514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-09-25

In the Matter of Timothy BUSH, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Timothy Bush, Gowanda, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Timothy Bush, Gowanda, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate who was a participant in the sex offender counseling and treatment program, signed an agreement to refrain from possessing pornographic materials. After a search of petitioner's cube revealed drawings depicting cartoon characters engaging in various sexual acts, he was charged with refusing to obey a direct order and possession of an article in an area where possession is prohibited. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of both charges and that determination was upheld on administrative appeal. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Initially, we agree with petitioner that substantial evidence does not support that part of the determination that found him guilty of refusing to obey a direct order ( see Matter of Newman v. Department of Corr. Servs., 110 A.D.3d 1309, 1310, 973 N.Y.S.2d 448 [2013]; Matter of Sierra v. Fischer, 82 A.D.3d 1436, 1437, 918 N.Y.S.2d 682 [2011] ). As such, that part of the determination is annulled. However, inasmuch as petitioner has served the penalty imposed and no loss of good time was recommended, the matter need not be remitted for a redetermination of the penalty ( see Matter of Rivera v. Fischer, 110 A.D.3d 1277, 1278, 973 N.Y.S.2d 473 [2013]; Matter of Pulecio v. Fischer, 109 A.D.3d 1068, 1069, 971 N.Y.S.2d 380 [2013], lv. denied22 N.Y.3d 858, 2014 WL 112692 [2014] ).

Turning to the remaining charge, the detailed misbehavior report and petitioner's admissions that he had agreed not to possess pornographic materials and that the drawings were in his possession provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Newman v. Department of Corr. Servs., 110 A.D.3d at 1309–1310, 973 N.Y.S.2d 448; Matter of Sierra v. Fischer, 82 A.D.3d at 1437, 918 N.Y.S.2d 682). Our review of the record reveals that the finding of guilt was based upon the evidence in the record rather than any alleged hearing officer bias ( see Matter of Fero v. Prack, 110 A.D.3d 1128, 1129, 972 N.Y.S.2d 115 [2013]; Matter of Abrams v. Fischer, 109 A.D.3d 1030, 1031, 971 N.Y.S.2d 361 [2013] ). His remaining claims have been reviewed and determined to be unpreserved or without merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of refusing to obey a direct order; petition granted to that extent and respondent is directed to expunge all references to this charge from petitioner's institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed. STEIN, J.P., McCARTHY, ROSE, EGAN JR. and LYNCH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bush v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Sep 25, 2014
120 A.D.3d 1514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Bush v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Timothy BUSH, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 25, 2014

Citations

120 A.D.3d 1514 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
120 A.D.3d 1514
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6350