From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bush v. E.H. Cottrell, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 15, 1970
33 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

January 15, 1970

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Goldman, P.J., Witmer, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The information gathered by plaintiffs' attorney, consisting of statements made by an automobile mechanic who examined a car owned by one of the plaintiffs, is material prepared for litigation. However, since it can no longer be duplicated and withholding it would result in injustice or undue hardship to the defendant, the plaintiffs should be required to produce it. (CPLR 3101, subd. [d]; cf. Clarke v. First Presbyterian Church of East Aurora, 30 A.D.2d 763, Brunswick Corp. v. Aetna Cas. Sur. Co., 27 A.D.2d 182.)


Summaries of

Bush v. E.H. Cottrell, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 15, 1970
33 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Bush v. E.H. Cottrell, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. BUSH, an Infant, by ROBERT T. BUSH, His Parent and Natural…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 15, 1970

Citations

33 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Sucrest Corp. v. Fisher Governor Co., Inc.

While questions were raised as to the timeliness of the respective applications, we do not deem these worthy…

Morrison v. Ellis

Defendant permitted plaintiffs to have a copy of the report, but with substantial deletions, contending that…