From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bush v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 3, 2011
CV. 10-780 SU (D. Or. Aug. 3, 2011)

Opinion

CV. 10-780 SU

08-03-2011

Randall Brian Bush, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

REDDEN, Judge:

Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan issued Findings and Recommendation (# 17) on July 8, 2011. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

When, as here, no objections are filed, the court is not required to give the record de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F2d 1202,1206 (9th Cir 1983). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist, 708 F2d 452, 454 (9th Cir 1983). I find no error. Accordingly, I adopt the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Sullivan.

The Commissioner's decision denying benefits is reversed and this matter is remanded for computation and payment of benefits in accordance with the Findings and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

James A. Redden

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bush v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 3, 2011
CV. 10-780 SU (D. Or. Aug. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Bush v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Randall Brian Bush, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 3, 2011

Citations

CV. 10-780 SU (D. Or. Aug. 3, 2011)