From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bush Indus., Inc. v. Slone Melhuish & Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 8, 2019
177 A.D.3d 1343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

1110 CA 19–00705

11-08-2019

BUSH INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. SLONE MELHUISH & CO., et al., Defendants, and Willis of New York, Inc., as Successor by Merger to Kalvin–Miller Holdings, LLC, as Successor by Merger to Hilb Rogal & Hobbs of Upstate New York, LLC, formerly known as Hilb Rogal and Hamilton Company of Upstate New York, LLC, as Successor by Merger to Hilb Rogal and Hamilton Company of Upstate New York, Inc., Defendant–Appellant.

STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP, NEW YORK CITY (CHARLES G. MOERDLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. DUKE HOLZMAN PHOTIADIS & GRESENS LLP, BUFFALO (THOMAS D. LYONS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.


STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP, NEW YORK CITY (CHARLES G. MOERDLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.

DUKE HOLZMAN PHOTIADIS & GRESENS LLP, BUFFALO (THOMAS D. LYONS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF–RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.


Summaries of

Bush Indus., Inc. v. Slone Melhuish & Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 8, 2019
177 A.D.3d 1343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Bush Indus., Inc. v. Slone Melhuish & Co.

Case Details

Full title:BUSH INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. SLONE MELHUISH & CO., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 8, 2019

Citations

177 A.D.3d 1343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
177 A.D.3d 1343