From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buseth v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 22, 2016
No. SA CV 15-1252-JFW (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2016)

Opinion

No. SA CV 15-1252-JFW (PLA)

01-22-2016

MARTIN LEIF BUSETH, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted.

2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record. DATED: January 22, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE JOHN F. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Buseth v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 22, 2016
No. SA CV 15-1252-JFW (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Buseth v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN LEIF BUSETH, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 22, 2016

Citations

No. SA CV 15-1252-JFW (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 22, 2016)