Opinion
25734
September 16, 2003.
APPEAL FROM THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 99-0220K)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL
Upon review of the record, it appears that the claims, counterclaims, cross-claims and third-party claims asserted in Civil No. 99-0220K were resolved by a series of orders and uncertified judgments, but the orders and the uncertified judgments were not reduced to a single judgment resolving all claims of all the parties. See HRCP 58; Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming Wright, 76 Haw. 115, 119-120, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338-39 (1994) (In a multiple-claim or multiple-party circuit court case in which all claims of all the parties have been resolved, an appeal may be taken after entry of a judgment that, on its face, resolves all claims of all the parties.). Absent entry of a judgment resolving the claims, counterclaims, cross-claims and third-party claims asserted in Civil No. 99-0220K, the appeal from Civil No. 99-0220K is premature and we lack jurisdiction. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.