From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Busch v. King Cnty. Corr. Facility

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 8, 2023
2:22-CV-1316-BJR-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 8, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-CV-1316-BJR-DWC

06-08-2023

MAJACQUE SHANTA BUSCH, Plaintiff, v. KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David W. Christel, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

The Court notes that no objections have been filed, but the mailing of the report to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. Pro se plaintiffs are obligated to keep the Court and opposing parties informed of their current mailing address, and failure to do so may result in dismissal of the action without prejudice. See Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 41 (b)(2).

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.
(2) Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The case is dismissed without prejudice. This dismissal constitutes a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Hon. David W. Christel.


Summaries of

Busch v. King Cnty. Corr. Facility

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 8, 2023
2:22-CV-1316-BJR-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Busch v. King Cnty. Corr. Facility

Case Details

Full title:MAJACQUE SHANTA BUSCH, Plaintiff, v. KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jun 8, 2023

Citations

2:22-CV-1316-BJR-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 8, 2023)