From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Buscemi v. Johnson

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Feb 24, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 65296 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

Motion No: 2011-10086 Docket No. F-17977-10/10A/10B M133733

02-24-2012

In the Matter of Lawrence Buscemi, appellant, v. Julie Johnson, respondent.


, J.P.

ARIEL E. BELEN

PLUMMER E. LOTT

ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant pro se for leave to prosecute an appeal from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated September 19, 2011, as a poor person.

ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is for leave to prosecute the appeal on the original papers is denied as unnecessary (see Family Ct Act § 1116), and the appeal will be heard on the original papers (including a certified transcript of the proceedings, if any) and on the briefs of the appellant, the respondent, and the attorney for the children, if any. The parties are directed to file nine copies of their respective briefs and to serve one copy on each other (22 NYCRR 670.9[d][1][ii]; Family Ct Act § 1116); and it is further,

ORDERED that the branches of the motion which are to waive the filing fee and for free transcripts are denied; and it is further,

ORDERED that within 30 days after the date of this decision and order on motion, the appellant shall file in the office of the Clerk of this Court one of the following:

(1) an affidavit or affirmation stating that there are no minutes of the Family Court proceedings to be transcribed for the appeal; or
(2) if there are such minutes, an affidavit or affirmation that the transcript has been received, and indicating the date that it was received; or
(3) if the transcript has not been received, an affidavit or affirmation stating that it has been ordered and paid for, the date thereof and the date by which the transcript is expected; or
(4) an affidavit or an affirmation withdrawing the appeal; and it is further,

ORDERED that if none of the actions described in (1), (2), (3), or (4) above has been taken within 30 days of the date of this scheduling order, the Clerk of the Court shall issue an order to all parties to the appeal to show cause why the appeal should or should not be dismissed.

SKELOS, J.P., BELEN, LOTT and MILLER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court


Summaries of

Buscemi v. Johnson

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Feb 24, 2012
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 65296 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Buscemi v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Lawrence Buscemi, appellant, v. Julie Johnson, respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2012

Citations

2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 65296 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)