Summary
holding . . . expert witness could testify that pictures would be of sexual interest to pedophiles especially when `"contested materials are directed at . . . [such] a bizarre deviant group that the experience of the trier of fact would be plainly inadequate to judge whether the material appeals to the prurient interest."'
Summary of this case from Barber v. StateOpinion
No. 91-5696.
December 2, 1991.
C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 936 F. 2d 232.