From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kapoor v. Interzan LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 14, 2019
172 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9319N M–1773 Index 158313/18

05-14-2019

Aman KAPOOR doing business as Sewlutions, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. INTERZAN LLC, Defendant–Respondent.

Law Office of Amos Weinberg, Great Neck (Harriette N. Boxer of counsel), for appellant. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP, Brooklyn (Maya K. Petrocelli of counsel), for respondent.


Law Office of Amos Weinberg, Great Neck (Harriette N. Boxer of counsel), for appellant.

Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP, Brooklyn (Maya K. Petrocelli of counsel), for respondent.

Richter, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Webber, Kern, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered November 30, 2018, which granted defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs. A defendant seeking to vacate a judgment entered upon its default must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay and a meritorious defense to the action (see generally Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 141, 501 N.Y.S.2d 8, 492 N.E.2d 116 [1986] ; CPLR 5015[a][1] ). Here, the record shows that defendant proffered a reasonable excuse of law office failure by submitting documentary evidence showing that, upon receipt of the draft summons and complaint, it promptly forwarded the filings to its legal counsel on retainer. Defendant also submitted an affidavit from its CEO who averred that he spoke with counsel and requested that counsel monitor the case filings and respond accordingly. It was reasonable for defendant to believe that its counsel would take the appropriate actions to defend the matter (see e.g. Rodgers v. 66 E. Tremont Hgts. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., 69 A.D.3d 510, 511, 893 N.Y.S.2d 55 [1st Dept. 2010] ; Heskel's W. 38th St. Corp. v. Gotham Constr. Co. LLC, 14 A.D.3d 306, 307, 787 N.Y.S.2d 285 [1st Dept. 2005] ). Moreover, upon learning of the default judgment entered against it when its bank froze its account, defendant immediately retained new counsel, who moved within four days to vacate the default.

There is no dispute that defendant also demonstrated a meritorious defense to plaintiff's claims.

Motion to enlarge record denied.


Summaries of

Kapoor v. Interzan LLC

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 14, 2019
172 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Kapoor v. Interzan LLC

Case Details

Full title:Aman Kapoor doing business as Sewlutions, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Interzan…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 14, 2019

Citations

172 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 3745
98 N.Y.S.3d 424

Citing Cases

Marks v. Nail & Spa 72, Inc.

Inaction by an insurance carrier has also been viewed as "akin to law office failure" (see Klein, 95 A.D.2d…

Sunblock Sys. v. Marcum, LLP

To vacate the orders on that ground, the plaintiff must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for its default…