Opinion
9319N M–1773 Index 158313/18
05-14-2019
Law Office of Amos Weinberg, Great Neck (Harriette N. Boxer of counsel), for appellant. Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP, Brooklyn (Maya K. Petrocelli of counsel), for respondent.
Law Office of Amos Weinberg, Great Neck (Harriette N. Boxer of counsel), for appellant.
Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP, Brooklyn (Maya K. Petrocelli of counsel), for respondent.
Richter, J.P., Manzanet–Daniels, Webber, Kern, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur F. Engoron, J.), entered November 30, 2018, which granted defendant's motion to vacate the default judgment entered against it, unanimously affirmed, with costs. A defendant seeking to vacate a judgment entered upon its default must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay and a meritorious defense to the action (see generally Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v. A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 N.Y.2d 138, 141, 501 N.Y.S.2d 8, 492 N.E.2d 116 [1986] ; CPLR 5015[a][1] ). Here, the record shows that defendant proffered a reasonable excuse of law office failure by submitting documentary evidence showing that, upon receipt of the draft summons and complaint, it promptly forwarded the filings to its legal counsel on retainer. Defendant also submitted an affidavit from its CEO who averred that he spoke with counsel and requested that counsel monitor the case filings and respond accordingly. It was reasonable for defendant to believe that its counsel would take the appropriate actions to defend the matter (see e.g. Rodgers v. 66 E. Tremont Hgts. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., 69 A.D.3d 510, 511, 893 N.Y.S.2d 55 [1st Dept. 2010] ; Heskel's W. 38th St. Corp. v. Gotham Constr. Co. LLC, 14 A.D.3d 306, 307, 787 N.Y.S.2d 285 [1st Dept. 2005] ). Moreover, upon learning of the default judgment entered against it when its bank froze its account, defendant immediately retained new counsel, who moved within four days to vacate the default.
There is no dispute that defendant also demonstrated a meritorious defense to plaintiff's claims.
Motion to enlarge record denied.