From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bus. Bank of St. Louis v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00050-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00050-WYD-MEH

07-17-2012

BUSINESS BANK OF ST. LOUIS, a Missouri Bank, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, in its capacity as Receiver for Colorado Capital Bank, a Colorado Bank in receivership, Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on July 13, 2012.

Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 11) filed July 13, 2012; docket #21] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The Court reminds the parties that it "will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel. " D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added). It is the responsibility of the moving party to "state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule..." Id. The present motion contains no such certificate, nor any other indication that counsel for Plaintiffs attempted to ascertain Defendant's position on the relief sought therein.


Summaries of

Bus. Bank of St. Louis v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jul 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00050-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Bus. Bank of St. Louis v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BUSINESS BANK OF ST. LOUIS, a Missouri Bank, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jul 17, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00050-WYD-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 17, 2012)