Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00050-WYD-MEH
07-17-2012
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on July 13, 2012.
Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (Doc. No. 11) filed July 13, 2012; docket #21] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The Court reminds the parties that it "will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel. " D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added). It is the responsibility of the moving party to "state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule..." Id. The present motion contains no such certificate, nor any other indication that counsel for Plaintiffs attempted to ascertain Defendant's position on the relief sought therein.