From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BURY v. BRADISH

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 21, 2006
Case No. 1:05-CV-00600-OWW-LJO-P, (Doc. 1) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05-CV-00600-OWW-LJO-P, (Doc. 1).

February 21, 2006


ORDER FINDING SERVICE OF COMPLAINT APPROPRIATE, AND FORWARDING SERVICE DOCUMENTS TO PLAINTIFF FOR COMPLETION AND RETURN


Plaintiff Larry W. Bury ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on May 4, 2005. The Court has screened Plaintiff's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and finds that it states a cognizable claim for relief under section 1983 against Defendants Bradish and Rascoe for acting with deliberate indifferent to his serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a); Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 512-15 (2002); Austin v. Terhune, 367 F.3d 1167, 1171 (9th Cir. 2004); Jackson v. Carey, 353 F.3d 750, 754 (9th Cir. 2003);Galbraith v. County of Santa Clara, 307 F.3d 1119, 1125-26 (9th Cir. 2002). Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants:

AMY BRADISH, RN

KAREN RASCOE, LVN

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff two (2) USM-285 forms, two (2) summonses, a Notice of Submission of Documents form, an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed May 4, 2005.
3. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the court with the following documents:

a. Completed summons;

b. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed above; and
c. Three (3) copies of the endorsed complaint filed May 4, 2005.
4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on Defendants and need not request waiver of service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the Court will direct the United States Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without payment of costs.
5. The failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BURY v. BRADISH

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 21, 2006
Case No. 1:05-CV-00600-OWW-LJO-P, (Doc. 1) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2006)
Case details for

BURY v. BRADISH

Case Details

Full title:LARRY W. BURY, Plaintiff, v. AMY BRADISH, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 21, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:05-CV-00600-OWW-LJO-P, (Doc. 1) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2006)