Burton v. the State

2 Citing cases

  1. Knowlton and Dominguez v. the State

    75 Tex. Crim. 8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1914)

    Chambers Watson, for appellants. — On question of defective recognizance and appeal bond: Burton v. State, 48 Tex. Crim. 544. C.E. Lane, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

  2. Hinton v. the State

    65 Tex. Crim. 408 (Tex. Crim. App. 1912)   Cited 11 times

    At a former day of this term this cause was dismissed because of the insufficiency of the recognizance. Appellant has filed a recognizance in accordance with the rules of this court promulgated in the case of Burton v. State, 48 Tex. Crim. 544, 90 S.W. Rep., 498, and the cause is ordered reinstated and we will consider it on its merits. Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault and his punishment assessed at a fine of $500 and imprisonment in jail for six months.