From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burton v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 3, 2012
NO. 1-10-0109 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 3, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 1-10-0109

04-03-2012

BART BURTON v. JOSH TAYLOR, et al.


JUDGE CAMPBELL

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a document titled "Plaintiff's Opposition to Report and Recommendation" (Docket No. 136), objecting to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 122), which was adopted and approved by this Court on March 30, 2012 (Docket No. 132).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. Nothing in Plaintiff's Objections changes the result. Therefore, the Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Court's prior Order (Docket No. 132) stands.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Burton v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 3, 2012
NO. 1-10-0109 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Burton v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:BART BURTON v. JOSH TAYLOR, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 3, 2012

Citations

NO. 1-10-0109 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 3, 2012)