From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burton v. Southwestern Gas Electric Company

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Oct 30, 1958
107 So. 2d 67 (La. Ct. App. 1958)

Opinion

No. 8897.

October 30, 1958.

Action by husband for recovery of medical bills resulting from treatment of his wife who was injured in an intersectional automobile collision, for loss of services of his wife, and for property damage to an automobile which was owned by his son. The First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, Henry F. Turner, J., entered judgment for defendant and plaintiff appealed. The Court of Appeal, Gladney, J., held that evidence established that husband incurred expenses on account of injuries to his wife in the amount of $456, and expenses of $7.50 for treatment of his son, and that his son suffered a contusion on his forehead, and a cut in his chin, which would be adequately compensated by an award of $100 damages, and that plaintiff was therefore entitled to an award of $563.50.

Judgment reversed and judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in accordance with opinion.

Julius T. Long, Shreveport, for appellant.

Wilkinson, Lewis, Wilkinson Madison, Shreveport, for appellee.


This suit was consolidated for trial in the lower court with that of Mrs. Lola Poland Burton v. Southwestern Gas and Electric Company, La. App., 107 So.2d 62, and involves substantially the identical issues of law and fact. Both suits arise out of an automobile accident which occurred on February 5, 1957, near the intersection of Burlingame and Seventieth Streets in the City of Shreveport, Louisiana. Mrs. Burton, at the time of the accident, was riding in a Ford sedan owned and driven by her son, James E. Burton, who was then nearly eighteen years of age.

[1-3] This suit is on behalf of Guy M. Burton, for the purpose of recovering medical bills resulting from treatment of his wife, for the loss of services of his wife and for property damage to the Ford automobile which admittedly was owned by his son. After an examination of the record we find plaintiff incurred expenses on account of the injuries to his wife in the amount of $456, and in our opinion he is entitled to judgment therefor. His claim for loss of services of his wife, which are alleged to amount to $3,000, is not supported by proof and must be denied. Plaintiff has likewise failed to adduce proof of loss due to the damage sustained by the Ford automobile. The record furnishes some testimony as to the cost of the vehicle which had been used for approximately a year, but there was no evidence as to its salvage value. Therefore, plaintiff's claim for property damages to the automobile of his son must be rejected.

We find that plaintiff is entitled to recover the sum of $7.50 incurred by reason of medical treatment of his son at the time of the accident, as well as nominal damages for the injuries received. The evidence shows James Burton received a contusion on his forehead and a cut in his chin which required three stitches. His other bruises were of a most superficial nature. We think that the sum of $100 would be adequate compensation for these injuries, which at the most only caused his son some discomfort. By way of summary, it is our finding that plaintiff should be awarded the sum of $563.50.

For the reasons hereinabove set forth, the judgment from which appealed is hereby reversed, annulled and set aside, and it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment in favor of Guy M. Burton and against the Southwestern Gas Electric Company in the sum of $563.50 with legal interest thereon from judicial demand until paid. It is further ordered that appellee pay all costs of this suit, including costs of the appeal.


Summaries of

Burton v. Southwestern Gas Electric Company

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit
Oct 30, 1958
107 So. 2d 67 (La. Ct. App. 1958)
Case details for

Burton v. Southwestern Gas Electric Company

Case Details

Full title:Guy M. BURTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN GAS ELECTRIC COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit

Date published: Oct 30, 1958

Citations

107 So. 2d 67 (La. Ct. App. 1958)

Citing Cases

Roy v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.

And it has been held that proof of salvage value is essential to a recovery for the total loss of a vehicle.…

Paige v. Mesisco

The correct method of determining the value of loss of a vehicle is by arriving at value of automobile before…