Opinion
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-179 (WLS)
12-20-2012
EDDIE JAMES BURTON, Plaintiff, v. Clerk of Court EVONNE MULL, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed September 14, 2012. (Doc. 35). It is recommended that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24) for failure to timely serve Defendant be denied, and that Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. 16) be dismissed. (Doc. 35 at 2-3). No objections were filed within the fourteen-day period provided pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The objection period expired on September 28, 2012. (See Doc. 35 at 3; Docket). Therefore, upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 35) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 24) and Plaintiff's Motion for Writ of Mandamus (Doc. 16) are both hereby DENIED.
________________________
THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT