From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burton v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 5, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-1980 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-1980 JAM JFM (PC).

October 5, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 5, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 5, 2011, are adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff's June 9, 2011 motion for injunctive relief is denied.


Summaries of

Burton v. McDonald

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 5, 2011
No. 2:10-cv-1980 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Burton v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:HARRISON L. BURTON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN McDONALD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-1980 JAM JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)