From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BURSTEIN v. LEIBINGER OEHM BREWING COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1898
30 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Opinion

May Term, 1898.


Order modified so as to direct that the judgment recovered by the plaintiff shall stand as security for any judgment she may hereafter obtain, and as thus modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. No opinion. All concurred, except Cullen, J., absent.


Summaries of

BURSTEIN v. LEIBINGER OEHM BREWING COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1898
30 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)
Case details for

BURSTEIN v. LEIBINGER OEHM BREWING COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:Pauline Burstein, Appellant, v. Leibinger Oehm Brewing Company, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1898

Citations

30 App. Div. 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1898)

Citing Cases

City Trust, S.D. S. Co. v. Haaslocher

er by reason of the refusal of the association to prosecute the said appeal, or by reason of the plaintiff…