From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burson v. Sepanek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at PIKEVILLE
Jun 5, 2017
Civil No. 7: 16-11-KKC (E.D. Ky. Jun. 5, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. 7: 16-11-KKC

06-05-2017

BILLY BURSON, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL SEPANEK, Warden, Respondent.


JUDGMENT

*** *** *** ***

Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 58 it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

1. The petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by Billy Burson [R. 1] is DENIED with respect to all issues raised in this proceeding.

2. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the respondent.

3. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no just cause for delay.

Dated June 5, 2017.

/s/

KAREN K. CALDWELL, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY


Summaries of

Burson v. Sepanek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at PIKEVILLE
Jun 5, 2017
Civil No. 7: 16-11-KKC (E.D. Ky. Jun. 5, 2017)
Case details for

Burson v. Sepanek

Case Details

Full title:BILLY BURSON, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL SEPANEK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at PIKEVILLE

Date published: Jun 5, 2017

Citations

Civil No. 7: 16-11-KKC (E.D. Ky. Jun. 5, 2017)