From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burrows v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1936
246 App. Div. 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

January, 1936.

Present — Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.


In an action to recover damages for alleged malpractice of a physician the jury, after nearly four hours of deliberation, found a verdict for the defendant. The appeal is based solely on the ground that the trial court in its charge made remarks on the evidence prejudicial to the plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Burrows v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1936
246 App. Div. 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Burrows v. Goldberg

Case Details

Full title:ROSE BURROWS, Appellant, v. JACOB GOLDBERG, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1936

Citations

246 App. Div. 822 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)