From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burrola v. Womack

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 13, 2023
2:23-cv-00006-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 13, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-00006-ART-NJK

07-13-2023

EDGAR BURROLA, Plaintiff, v. MARC WOMACK, and TD AUTO FINANCE, Defendants.


ORDER

ANNE R TRAUM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendants' TD Auto Finance and Marc Womack's Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 3). Plaintiff Edgar Burrola (“Burrola”) failed to oppose Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Under Local Rule 7-2(d), “[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion, except a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 or a motion for attorney's fees, constitutes a consent to the granting of the motion.” LR 7-2(d).

Because Burrola's failure to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 3) constitutes consent to the granting of the motion under the local rules the Court grants Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.

It is therefore ordered that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

It is further ordered that this case is dismissed without prejudice.

The clerk of court is respectfully directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Burrola v. Womack

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jul 13, 2023
2:23-cv-00006-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 13, 2023)
Case details for

Burrola v. Womack

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR BURROLA, Plaintiff, v. MARC WOMACK, and TD AUTO FINANCE, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jul 13, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-00006-ART-NJK (D. Nev. Jul. 13, 2023)