From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burress v. State

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Oct 24, 2011
Memorandum Opinion No. 2011-MO-029 (S.C. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion No. 2011-MO-029

10-24-2011

David Michael Burress, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner, Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Karen Ratigan, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI


Appeal From Greenville County

Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge


DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Petitioner,

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Attorney General Karen Ratigan, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : We granted a writ of certiorari to review the circuit court's denial of post-conviction relief for Petitioner. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Burress v. State

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Oct 24, 2011
Memorandum Opinion No. 2011-MO-029 (S.C. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Burress v. State

Case Details

Full title:David Michael Burress, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Court:THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

Memorandum Opinion No. 2011-MO-029 (S.C. Oct. 24, 2011)