From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burrell v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1917
118 N.E. 1053 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued October 18, 1917

Decided November 20, 1917

Truman H. Baldwin and George E. Baldwin for appellant.

Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel ( Charles J. Nehrbas and Terence Farley of counsel), for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., COLLIN, CUDDEBACK and ANDREWS, JJ. Dissenting: CARDOZO, POUND and CRANE, JJ.


Summaries of

Burrell v. City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1917
118 N.E. 1053 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

Burrell v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:FENELLA BURRELL, Appellant, v . CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 20, 1917

Citations

118 N.E. 1053 (N.Y. 1917)
118 N.E. 1053

Citing Cases

Loyal Tire Ctr. v. Thruway

However, it appears whatever vitality Benz enjoys is limited to the gloss upon it by the United States…

Burrell v. City of New York

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 222 N.Y.…