From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burnsed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 7, 2000
761 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 2D00-409.

Opinion filed April 7, 2000.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P.9.140(i) from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Wayne L. Cobb, Judge.


Gerald Plesant Burnsed, Jr., appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court denied the motion as being successive and an abuse of procedure. Because rule 3.800 contains no proscription against successive motions, a motion brought pursuant to that rule cannot be denied on this ground. See Burns v. State, 637 So.2d 937 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Price v. State, 692 So.2d 971 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). Such an error would ordinarily require reversal. In the interest of judicial economy, however, we reviewed Burnsed's motion and determined that neither of his claims is cognizable in a proceeding pursuant to rule 3.800. See Gartrell v. State, 626 So.2d 1364 (Fla. 1993). We, therefore, affirm the denial of his motion.

Affirmed.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Burnsed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 7, 2000
761 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Burnsed v. State

Case Details

Full title:GERALD PLESANT BURNSED, JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 7, 2000

Citations

761 So. 2d 1139 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)