From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burns v. Williams

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 18, 2022
2:21-CV-11717-TGB-KGA (E.D. Mich. Jan. 18, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-11717-TGB-KGA

01-18-2022

THOMAS BURNS, SR., Plaintiff, v. MARTEZ WILLIAMS ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

TERRENCE G. BERG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This case was filed in this district on July 26, 2021. Since that date, Plaintiff has taken no further action. On September 8, 2021, the Court entered an order explaining that Plaintiff's Complaint did not appear to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 3. The Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause, in writing, why the Complaint should not be dismissed for failure state a claim in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2). Id. Plaintiff has not responded to that order. As part of its inherent authority to manage its docket, the Court has the power to dismiss a complaint sua sponte for failure to prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-32 (1962).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-captioned case shall be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Burns v. Williams

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 18, 2022
2:21-CV-11717-TGB-KGA (E.D. Mich. Jan. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Burns v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS BURNS, SR., Plaintiff, v. MARTEZ WILLIAMS ET AL., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 18, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-11717-TGB-KGA (E.D. Mich. Jan. 18, 2022)