From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burns v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 29, 1975
219 S.E.2d 624 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)

Summary

holding that the distinctive UPS insignia was insufficient to authorize an inference that the driver was an agent or employee and was acting in the course of his employment

Summary of this case from Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v. Peachstate Auto Ins. Agency, Inc.

Opinion

51130.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 17, 1975.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1975.

Action for damages. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Tidwell.

O'Brien, Smith Reily, Michael J. Reily, for appellant.

Swift, Currie, McGhee Hiers, George W. Hart, for appellee.


This is an appeal from the grant of a motion for directed verdict for defendant in a personal injury suit where plaintiff alleged that defendant's truck, operated by its agent within the scope of his employment, negligently collided with a truck driven by plaintiff.

At trial plaintiff established by his testimony that a tractor-trailer truck with the letters "UPS" on the door of the tractor forced him off the highway; that the tractor was brown and the trailer was silver or aluminum; and that he could not identify the driver. A representative of defendant testified that the tractor-trailer trucks operated by defendant generally consist of a brown tractor with a grey trailer with the initials "UPS" appearing on the doors of the tractor and above the wheels of the trailer units. No other evidence was submitted on the issue of ownership of the vehicle and the alleged agency relationship of the defendant and the unidentified driver. Held:

We affirm. We have held in very similar factual situations that plaintiff's evidence as to the type of truck marked with a distinctive insignia was insufficient to authorize inferences of ownership of the tractor-trailer; or that it was being operated by an agent or employee of defendant in the course of his employment. Southern R. Co. v. Hullender, 62 Ga. App. 274 ( 8 S.E.2d 674); Clark v. Veterans Transportation, 113 Ga. App. 531 ( 148 S.E.2d 921). Plaintiff failed to prove a prima facie case of liability. The directed verdict for defendant was correct.

Judgment affirmed. Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.


SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 17, 1975 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 29, 1975.


Summaries of

Burns v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 29, 1975
219 S.E.2d 624 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)

holding that the distinctive UPS insignia was insufficient to authorize an inference that the driver was an agent or employee and was acting in the course of his employment

Summary of this case from Travelers Indem. Co. of Conn. v. Peachstate Auto Ins. Agency, Inc.

refusing to find liability where plaintiff testified that a tractor-trailer marked with the letters "UPS" forced him off the highway

Summary of this case from Knight v. Swift Transportation Co., Inc.
Case details for

Burns v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BURNS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 29, 1975

Citations

219 S.E.2d 624 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
219 S.E.2d 624

Citing Cases

Sellers v. Air Therm Co.

The issue in this appeal concerns the nature of proof required to sustain a verdict in a hit-and-run vehicle…

Studstill v. American Oil Company

The police officer's reference to the vehicle as the American Oil truck is insufficient to authorize…