Opinion
17-cv-81152-BLOOM/Reinhart
02-15-2022
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
BETH BLOOM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Defendant's Verified Amended Motion for Attorneys' Fees, ECF No. [127], filed on October 12, 2021 (“Motion”). The Motion was previously referred to the Honorable Bruce E. Reinhart for a Report and Recommendations (“R&R”). See ECF No. [128]. On January 31, 2022, Magistrate Judge Reinhart issued an R&R recommending that the Motion be denied. ECF No. [132]. The R&R states that the parties shall file any objections within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of a copy of the R&R. Id. To date, the parties have filed no objections, nor have they sought additional time in which to do so.
Nevertheless, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the R&R and the record in this case and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review, the Court finds the R&R to be well reasoned and correct. The Court therefore agrees with the analysis in the R&R and concludes that the Motion must be DENIED for the reasons set forth therein.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
1. The R&R, ECF No. [132], is ADOPTED.
2. The Motion, ECF No. [127], is DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED