holding that Younger abstention is proper when there is a pending state court action, the state court action implicates an important state interest, and there is an adequate opportunity in the state proceeding to raise constitutional challenges
Summary of this case from Curtis v. CorbettNo. 94-1814.
June 19, 1995.
C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 44 F. 3d 524.
holding that Younger abstention is proper when there is a pending state court action, the state court action implicates an important state interest, and there is an adequate opportunity in the state proceeding to raise constitutional challenges
Summary of this case from Curtis v. Corbettholding that Younger abstention is proper when there is a pending state court action, the state court action implicates an important state interest, and there is an adequate opportunity in the state proceeding to raise constitutional challenges
Summary of this case from Morris v. Stateholding that Younger abstention is proper when there is a pending state court action, the state court action implicates an important state interest, and there is an adequate opportunity in the state proceeding to raise constitutional challenges
Summary of this case from Mercado v. Stateholding that Younger abstention is proper when there is a pending state court action, the state court action implicates an important state interest, and there is an adequate opportunity in the state proceeding to raise constitutional challenges
Summary of this case from White v. United Statesholding thatYounger abstention is proper when there is a pending state court action, the state court action implicates an important state interest, and there is an adequate opportunity in the state proceeding to raise constitutional challenges
Summary of this case from Joshua v. Stateholding that Younger abstention is proper when there is a pending state court action, the state court action implicates an important state interest, and there is an adequate opportunity in the state proceeding to raise constitutional challenges
Summary of this case from Mortland v. MaidaFull title:BURNS v. REED
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 19, 1995
We have taken jurisdiction of such an appeal in the past, however, see Snodgrass v. Jones, 957 F.2d 482 (7th…
Shelton v. StateShelton appealed to the United States Supreme Court, which denied certiorari. Shelton v. Delaware, 515 U.S.…