From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Burns v. Murray

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 24, 1925
203 N.W. 610 (Minn. 1925)

Opinion

No. 24,089.

April 24, 1925.

Case followed.

See Municipal Corporations, 28 Cyc. p. 1747.

Action in the district court for St. Louis county. Defendants appealed from an order Hughes, J., overruling their demurrers to the complaint. Affirmed.

J.C. McGilvery, Boyle Montague, John J. Fee and George H. Spear, for appellants.

Giblin Manthey, for respondent.



This is a companion case to Burns v. Van Buskirk, supra, page 48. A recovery from appellants of $19,161, paid to professional baseball and hockey players, is sought. The complaint alleges that this sum was withdrawn from the city treasury and paid to the players by direction of the city council, upon city orders signed by the mayor and clerk and paid by the treasurer. All concerned are charged with having known that their acts were illegal and that actions brought on account of similar illegal expenditures were pending.

The case is ruled by Burns v. Van Buskirk, and the order overruling the demurrer to the complaint is affirmed.


Summaries of

Burns v. Murray

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 24, 1925
203 N.W. 610 (Minn. 1925)
Case details for

Burns v. Murray

Case Details

Full title:H.L. BURNS v. G.H. MURRAY AND OTHERS

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Apr 24, 1925

Citations

203 N.W. 610 (Minn. 1925)
203 N.W. 610