Opinion
245 CA 14-01126
07-02-2015
Burden, Gulisano & Hickey, LLC, Buffalo (Philip M. Gulisano of Counsel), for Defendants–Appellants Lecesse Construction Services LLC, The Mills High Falls Housing Development Fund Company, Inc. and Urban League of Rochester, N.Y., Inc. Rupp, Baase, Pfalzgraf, Cunningham & Coppola LLC, Rochester (Matthew A. Lenhard of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant Dukes Property Development, LLC. Lippman O'Connor, Buffalo (Robert H. Flynn of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant U.S. Ceiling Corp. Goergen, Manson & McCarthy, Buffalo (Kelly J. Philips of Counsel), for Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellant. Trevett Cristo Salzer & Andolina, P.C., Rochester (Daniel P. Debolt of Counsel), for Third–Party Defendant–Respondent. Cellino & Barnes, P.C., Rochester (K. John Wright of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Respondent.
Burden, Gulisano & Hickey, LLC, Buffalo (Philip M. Gulisano of Counsel), for Defendants–Appellants Lecesse Construction Services LLC, The Mills High Falls Housing Development Fund Company, Inc. and Urban League of Rochester, N.Y., Inc.
Rupp, Baase, Pfalzgraf, Cunningham & Coppola LLC, Rochester (Matthew A. Lenhard of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant Dukes Property Development, LLC.
Lippman O'Connor, Buffalo (Robert H. Flynn of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant U.S. Ceiling Corp.
Goergen, Manson & McCarthy, Buffalo (Kelly J. Philips of Counsel), for Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellant.
Trevett Cristo Salzer & Andolina, P.C., Rochester (Daniel P. Debolt of Counsel), for Third–Party Defendant–Respondent.
Cellino & Barnes, P.C., Rochester (K. John Wright of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Respondent.
Opinion
Same memorandum as in Burns v. Lecesse Constr. Servs. LLC (Appeal No. 1), 130 A.D.3d 1429, 12 N.Y.S.3d 722, 2015 WL 4034684 (July 2, 2015).
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals by defendants Lecesse Construction Services LLC, The Mills High Falls Housing Development Fund Company, Inc. and Urban League of Rochester, N.Y., Inc. and defendant-third-party plaintiff Pro Carpet, Inc. are unanimously dismissed without costs, and the order insofar as appealed from is reversed on the law without costs, those parts of the motion of defendant Dukes Property Development, LLC and the cross motion of defendant U.S. Ceiling Corp. with respect to the Labor Law § 241(6) claim are granted, and that claim is dismissed against them.
SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.